P５是啥。能吃嗎?他整合了記憶體控制器?

　　玩網路遊戲就是K８。沒得比。雙通的K８是最佳的大型網路遊戲的最佳化處理器。下面是大型的網路即時３D戰略遊戲。超到２.８G的K８性能是P４-２.８CG的２倍性能。完全證實大型網路遊戲超微K８對北木版P４"C"有每時脈效能達到一倍之差的論斷。有人說是１＋１＝２。

　　呵呵。就是"是",又怎樣。

http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=60000271

　　另外在全軍破敵遊戲,請注意雙通K７XP-３２００＋超過單通K８-３２００＋的情況。

　　A 2.8 GHz Athlon 64 FX-57 is almost twice as fast as a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4... Megalomaniacs and brutal medieval warlords everywhere, the Athlon 64 FX is your chip, the Mach II your cooling system.

　　此文中Megalomaniacs是雙關語。應該是MegaRomanics的雙關語。可譯為數以百萬計的古羅馬人。天堂２人多的時候也是這類狀況。所以拿此遊戲當作天堂２的對照最準確。

Medieval: Total War 全軍破敵。

Medieval: Total War
System FPS

nVENTIV Mach II (A64 FX 2.8 GHz) 130.4

Athlon 64 FX-55 2.6 GHz 119.15

Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4 GHz 107.9

Athlon 64 FX-51 2.2 GHz 104.6

Athlon XP 3200+ 85.2

P4 3.4 GHz EE 81.9

P4 3.2 GHz EE 79.1

Athlon 64 3200+ 77.7

P4 3.2 GHz "C" 73

P4 2.8 GHz "C" 64

P4 2.4 GHz "C" 54.4

下面是神話世紀遊戲。也是超微K８以每時脈性能IPC差兩倍勝過北木P４C。

Age of Mythology

Graph Title

System FPS

nVENTIV Mach II (A64 FX 2.8 GHz) 75.7

Athlon 64 FX-55 2.6 GHz 72.4

Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4 GHz 67.2

Athlon 64 FX-51 2.2 GHz 62.8

Athlon 64 3200+ 56.7

P4 3.4 GHz EE 46.4

P4 3.2 GHz EE 43.9

P4 3.2 GHz "C" 42.5

Athlon XP 3200+ 42.8

P4 2.8 GHz "C" 37

P4 2.4 GHz "C" 30.6


http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=65000313

　　此頁裡面第２個遊戲是大量消耗人工智慧的的Disciples II遊戲。

　　秒數越低越好。

Disciples II (Seconds: Lower is Better)
CPU Seconds

Athlon 64 3800+ 11.7 秒

Athlon 64 FX-53 S939 11.6秒

Athlon 64 3700+ 11.6秒

Athlon 64 FX-53 S940 11.6秒

Athlon 64 3400+ 12.8秒

P4 3.4 GHz "EE" 22 秒

P4 3.2 GHz "C" 26.5秒

時間差快一倍。

　　Disciples II is not the most exciting game out there, but it sports a very special fantasy atmosphere. The AI opponents are quite capable, and take a horribly long time to think about their next move on slightly slower machines. We measured the time between finishing your turn and getting control back. We also made sure that our benchmark does not include the display of any movement on the screen. In other words, we are measuring AI thinking time for the most part. The picture below does not show the benchmark.I do not have to tell you that these results have to be taken with a grain of salt as we had to work with a stop watch. So it is not possible to measure small differences. However... It is very clear that the Athlon 64 eats the Pentium 4 for breakfast in this test. Even with error margins above 5%, you will figure out that a Pentium 4-based system has to wait quite a bit longer. In fact, even with such coarse measurement methods, the results are quite spectacular.

　　所以,英特爾就是派出桌上版DOTHAN多桑也不行。多桑得超到２.４G才有小看頭。但大型即時３D網路遊戲性能還是遠遠輸給K８。而且那樣超,誰都可以超啊。K８更好超。還更便宜。