3張雞尾酒式的小吸引人 ㄟ數據
什麼意思呀....

我不太清楚你怎麼分析這個數據的，
以你的預算，應該是在比較9600Pro和5600Ultra吧?
光看第一張圖事實上就夠了，1024x768，4XAA+8XAF，76.6 v.s. 55.7；

不過到後來 解析度越提高後 相差越來越近的

到了最高解析度時 可以說根本是沒差了

問題是對你用的E70F你認為1600x1200有任何意義嗎?
仔細看一下，9600在上到某一個解析度的時候
(我記得是只要1600x1200，開啟4xaa)
會有一個非常大的performance drop，
當初9600剛上市在beyond3D的review就有提到過這點
(他們推測我記得是內部的cache太少)

況且，你知道圖表上的5600Ultra是跑400 / 400 嗎?
你所要買的5600(Non-ultra??)，跑的時脈是多少呢?
(一般來說，是325 / 275)

補充：
http://www.beyond3d.com/reviews/ati.../index.php?p=17



The internal cache sizes in RV350 are reduced from R300, which is probably why there is a reasonably large disparity between the 9600 PRO and 9500 PRO with 6X FSAA enabled. Both 4X and 2X AA show the 9600 PRO very close in performance to the 9500 PRO, up until 1600x1200 where we see the now characteristic fill-rate performance drop off.

ATI state that as this is a mainstream part, they have put their efforts into optimising, as much as possible, non-AA rendering and AA rendering up to 1280x1024 with 4X.