-r/rw is useless ?????
 

according to the information as attached, +R/RW have a significant benefit of ---- "DVD+R/W has some "better" features than DVD-R/W such as lossless linking and both CAV and CLV writing"

http://www.videohelp.com/dvd

personaly, as far as the dvd writer supports " bootype " , -R/RW writing is useless. so why we still have to purse for both 16x at +/- r/rw! :confused: :confused:

why not just buy +R/rw dics and use booktype to ensure the compatibility?


thank you for your advice.

對我只是燒燒資料的人都沒差,不過-r,-rw我覺得lead-in與lead-out比較慢
,平平是燒資料我還是使用dvd+r,+rw比較快一點.

正常的pioneer ,ASUS dvd燒錄機燒什麼種類片子都是正常,發生問題的人
沒麼好撐趕快拿去修吧.

thank you for your sharing.

by the way, there is a rumor that +r disc is more durable.
is that true?

thank in advance

我是認為比較+/-規格誰優誰劣沒意義，
畢竟規格不干我的事，方便取得、使用穩定對我才重要，
就算+真的優於-，但佔有不了市場又有什麼用！
能取得市場認同的規格就是好規格，
SCSI vs IDE，我認為就蠻明顯的。

actually,

i am just struggling whether i shall buy the -R/Rw stream dvd rw - pioneer/ asus..

OR +R/rw stream dvd rw - philips, benq, liteon..etc

but the -r/rw stream dvd writer is a little bit expensive than that of the +r/rw one.

thats why i wrote this article to consult your ideas if booktype can resolve the compatibility problem. i.e. use +r/rw stream dvd writer to write all those +r/rw disc and chnage to either -r or dvd rom for compatiblity.

do u think this works? and may be better than using -r/rw disc??

以前讀過一些說法:對於某些較久遠的機器, booktype仍然沒辦法保證相容性.
不過這問題對我來說不大(應該說目前尚未遇到這情形,因為我幾乎都是用電腦觀看DVD)
-R容量比+R大上幾MB的樣子(在某些情況下,這多出來的幾MB可能就很好用了)
雖然如此,我還是比較信賴與喜歡+R,尤其是知道前鎮子網路上的一篇文章"Why DVD+R(W) is superior to DVD-R(W)"後
我燒錄機是800A,目前為止都用+R系列的.

oh thank you for your advice.