NVIDIA又搞降低畫質換取性能的把戲(這次是AquaMark3)
 

原文出處[From driverheaven]
http://www.driverheaven.net/article...mark3/index.htm



Now, im sure most of you have read Gabes recent comments regarding the detonator 51.75s, and Nvidia's offical response but I really do have to say, having seen this first hand it confirms to both myself and Veridian that the new detonators are far from a high quality IQ set. Alot of negative publicity is currently surrounding Nvidia, and here at driverheaven we like to remain as impartial and open minded as we possibly can, but after reading all the articles recently such as here coming from good sources and experiencing this ourselves first hand, I can no longer recommend an nvidia card to anyone. Ill be speaking with nvidia about this over the coming days and if I can make anything public I will.

NVIDIA的driver optimization guideline:rolleyes:

AquaMark3 - Preview (From gugu3d)

http://www.guru3d.com/article.php?c...6&pagenumber=10

That being said Aquamark seems to be build in a very objective way without graphics card manufacturers interference. The results you were able to witness today can never have been cheated on as the chipset designers did have not even had a chance to make modifications in their drivers. Come to think of it, it's quite sad that I once again have to mention illegal performance enhancing techniques in drivers in the conclusion of a really, really nice piece of software that measures graphics performance in a variety of ways.

畫質差異(9800 Pro vs 5600)

畫質差異(雷管 45.33 vs 51.75)

畫質比較(雷管 45.23 vs 51.75)

與其繼續搞App optimize的手段,
NV不如加緊腳步在NV4x家族上面...

ATI的貼圖畫質確實好呀~~~

圖是不是會動啊
用800x600來看,很奇怪啊

回覆: NVIDIA又搞降低畫質換取性能的把戲(這次是AquaMark3)
 

peter said Don't steal bandwith.:D

----------
9800vs5600
ati貼圖畫質真的差很多耶..