![]() |
PCDVD數位科技討論區
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/index.php)
- 效能極限
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
- - [心得]原來 DFI 975 不是每張都能上400
(https://www.pcdvd.com.tw/showthread.php?t=673668)
|
---|
引用:
不是在說你啦 :rolleyes: 將來也很期待你再帶來青雲的怪東東測試 :agree: |
引用:
我努力啦...其實..你說的很正確.. 我的確是如你所說的..很豬頭..不過..我還是說聲謝謝.. 沒有人"兔曹"我..我也沒有進步的動力.. 人往往不服輸..我也是..所以..我很感謝你.. 前陣子..我還很討厭你..老實說..不怕你罵我.. 後來發現..自己是個豬頭..現在..我發現..你當時真的很好.. 我自己卻不懂..見識太少了.. 最近的人生體驗..讓我不得不說..真的很感謝你..讓我成長不少.. 年紀不論..聞道有先後不論..光是角度的不同..看法的不同.. 我都該虛心接受..而不是一昧的顧到自己.. 只能說..真的謝謝你.. :like: :like: :like: |
引用:
感謝有力兄的幫忙 再次叩謝 :like: |
引用:
AM2的除頻方面有點怪 像是200外頻下 調DDRII 800,實際能跑800的只有X10.X12.X14 其他倍頻都會降DDRII,所以您的應該是誤判... 280外頻使用X10再選DDRII 800是跑1120沒錯 若是X8倍頻的話,為1120X4/5=>DDRII 896 抱歉 最近都在跑Intel平台,連單數或不到10的複數倍頻會降DDRII時脈的問題都忘了 下面有fsaa3dfx兄的的比照圖,參考看看 :ase http://forum.pcdvd.com.tw/showthrea...%B0%A3%C0W+%C0W |
|
引用:
這張REV.AXX 那....快退................................... |
引用:
那.......表現如何? |
引用:
改動的地方都在RAM附近 根據發現者TONY的說法,應該是針對RAM做的改動 |
引用:
我也注意到了.不曉得ram的表現會怎樣. |
引用原文
DFI suffered some quite unnecessary slating for its Infinity 975, most thought because it was a DFI it had to be a beast of an overclocker, fact it while it was a reasonable overclocker it was no monster. A recent bios update has improved thing with many hitting well over 400fsb with most C2D cpu's now so there has been a small turn around, thing is there is a new board revison also...i have them here and will show some differences. Tests will follow in a few weeks; for now enjoy the differences, I have a feeling this board will clock a little differently. 舊版 新版 As you see a total rework for the ram here Not sure on the clocking as not had tme to play, coupled with the new bios I have a feeling this may be quite a turn around for the little Infinity |
所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是12:41 AM. |
vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。