怎麼不考慮Wind? 3cell差不多400多, 功能強很多, 不像HP 用 VIA....

Aspire One 沒有BT, 如果是我可能不考慮....

但是說實在的, BB 或 FS沒有賣WIND, 是我也不敢買, 因為有問題不能退... hahaha

有沒有人有iphone 3G啊?? 想買配件, 有沒有人有好介紹??

加拿大有誰在賣WIND :confused:
台灣的就算了 看得到吃不到
10" 有點大 櫃子放不下
HP的剛剛好

目前買的 HP 是 2GB RAM 160 GB HDD
明天打算跟 INGRAM 拿基本機型 反正硬碟 RAM 我有現成的
這樣可以便宜大約$300左右

今天沒上班 看是否能改成上 OS X :laugh:

BB 和 FS 的好處 真的就是玩膩了可以退
不過這樣養成了一個很壞的習慣 就是功課沒好好做就敗回來玩 :jolin:

對了 WIND 的好處在哪裡 我怎麼看不出來

HP的好處 給你 WIN XP PRO 和 VISTA BUSINESS :D
東西小

壞處 給 XP PRO SP2 :tu: 滑鼠按鍵不習慣 有點燙
螢幕兩旁的喇叭實在很礙眼








不過我同事笑我 等HP 換成VIA新CPU 我又得再敗一次 :stupefy:

比較希望看到有背光的鍵盤 :shy: :yeah:

Wind 也沒說有什麼特別的. 10" LED背光 LCD, 1G RAM, 80G SATA 2.5", Wi-Fi, BT, Webcam, Winxp Home... 但是CPU是Atom 1.6G, 理論上比VIA快,...
價錢我剛剛check了一下大概是$579, 對不起記錯價錢了...但是現在6cell 好像缺貨... (好像只有pink!!?)

又, INGRAM有賣hp mini的基本型?? 有意思, 可否多講一下??

請收PM :D

剛剛再BestBuy 看到 Linksys WRT310N, Wireless N + Gigabite Lan...

請問有人有用過這一台嗎?? 性能如何??

Linksys有一定的水準, 至少不會比人差. 通常是benchmark的基準.
如果是為了11n, 那不要期望太多, 冀望能夠承受得起HD長時間穩定的流量.
網路爬了一下文, 11n在現實使用上還是挫折不斷.
這一陣子心在癢, 相中D-Link DIR-855
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30475/96/
http://review.zdnet.com/routers/d-l...6-32820169.html
你可以參考.

感謝你的資訊~ :D

其實Wireless N的部分並不是很重要, 小弟因為想組個Media Home Server, 想透過Gigabit 來stream 1080p的電影... 不知道有沒有人有好建議??

又, 有沒有人知道Cat. 5e 和 Cat. 6e 有什麼差別??

感謝!

發錯，刪~~~

*** What is the difference between Cat 5e and Cat 6?

This is one of the most common questions we're asked. There are two major differences:


* Signal to noise ratio

* Bandwidth used to test the cable


The first difference is the most important. Cat 6 Cat 6 is twelve times less "noisy", than Cat 5e. When your computer sends data across your network some data packets are lost or corrupted along the way. These packets have to be resent by the system. The better the signal to noise ratio is on your network, the less often this happens.

As computer networks become faster, the signal to noise ratio becomes more important. If the network is racking up packets that must be resent faster than it can resend them, the network may eventually fail or slow to a crawl with the backlog. Using cable and components that have better signal to noise ratios, such as those rated to Cat 6, can help to prevent this potential problem.

As for the testing bandwidth, the official Cat 5e standard calls for testing across a bandwidth of 100 MHz. The Cat 6 standard calls for testing across a bandwidth of 250 MHz. The reality is that most computers and networking equipment only transmit across a frequency range of 100 MHz. (In the future, of course, actual utilization of greater bandwidth may become more common.)

When it comes down to it, however, this particular stat isn't all that important. Many cable companies tout the high bandwidth of their cable. Some even test up to as high as 700 MHz. It sounds great for marketing, but the truth is that the MHz rating is not the same as speed. All cable rated Cat 5e or Cat 6 is capable of Gigabit Ethernet. The MHz rating is just the frequency range used for testing the cable.

出處這裡： http://fourpair.blogspot.com/


建議用 Linksys RVS4000, D-Link 早期的機種很好，但是後來因為打低價策略，
機種越來越多，也看不出來有什麼不一樣，有一陣子熱當的很厲害，又加上前幾年
有到D-Llink 的 OEM 公司應徵，新仇加舊恨，根本不推薦使用在 business 或是
office, 家用就勉強啦！！

網路設備, 個人是偏好 linksys...

原因, 其實我也不知道 XD
只是從很早以前就常用 linksys 的...

近期打算再把家裡的網路重新佈線, 原因除了架設 HTPC, 還想試試看電力線網路,
因為房間的電力負荷不了那麼多台電腦... orz

家裡有不少 CAT5 的線, 其中還有一條訂做的 CAT5e STP, 被我當寶 XD
如果家裡的電腦的電線不是纏成一團 或是對線路品質非常要求, 或是要跨長距離, 基本上 CAT 5 就夠了