「論入境全篩跟入境普篩之不同」

德國表演的是沒隔離，和現在指揮中心要演的劇本不一樣。
你特別指出中港澳旅遊史，
是要表明戴口罩對這些地區來的沒有用？
還是從其它地區來的就沒問題嗎？

入境全篩檢的問題，很明顯，指揮中心去年的說法通不過時間的檢驗。

通不過時間的考驗...
所以有人 2020 是在疫區度過嗎? 還是是籠國來的帳號?

以前講的有道理有科學根據，現在何必要變？
道理講不過，就開始栽贓身份轉移話題。

去年只要有人提入境普篩

就會被人說是普篩仔

某個陣亡者就是這樣在PCDVD上罵人

:jolin: :jolin: :jolin: :jolin:

阿中說: 怎麼不早說

反正滾動式調整就是 昨是今非 就是今天的你不可以罵昨天的我

:think: :think: :think: :think:

不要說去年了，上一頁就有人這麼說了。

...........
然後被 X+Y 打爆..
:laugh:

先來看看打疫苗前的死亡, 再來比比後面的
https://udn.com/news/story/121707/5541210



另外很多人愛討論的50%有效....
智利變種是P1
碰到變種不要到最後大家都軟腳蝦就好了...

至於抗體濃度是不是越高越好, 不好說.... 希望大家都多多去打mRNA type的來驗證給50年後的人看


Is the Moderna vaccine effective against the Gamma strain?
Early results from lab studies show that the Moderna vaccine produces active antibodies against mutations in the Gamma variant, although the antibodies are slightly less effective against this variant. Immunity is not an all or nothing response – even if the antibodies produced in response to a vaccine are slightly less effective at binding to a variant of the virus, this does not mean that it will not give protection against disease.

Another early laboratory study looking at immune cells in the blood of people who had had the Moderna vaccine found that mutations present in coronavirus variants, including the Gamma variant, didn’t seem to affect whether these cells were able to react to the virus.

More research is needed to understand how effective the vaccine is against the Gamma variant, including studies in real people who have had the vaccine.

mRNA會怎樣這個嘛
可能就是會有一些肌肉細胞的自體免疫問題吧
反正CureVAC把抗體效價做得比BNT跟莫德納低
結果47%的有效性沒人要
面對SARS-COV-2的威脅就是只要現在看不到明顯可能的危害
就先求有效囉