飛上去, 是一種對於地勤支援的信任, 真的賭很大.

http://www.storm.mg/article/445394

在漢光演習首日由F-16戰機模擬敵機攻擊基隆港的演練科目，過去曾演練過，相關航線過去也都飛過，昨日演練和飛航路線並非第一次，失事戰機在飛臨攻擊目標前高度降到2千呎

由於吳彥霆最後的通聯，是在失事前曾回報「入雲」

感覺是高度太低又偏離預定航線去撞山?

>> 今天是爲了演習演練訓練課目而意外失事，只能叫殉職(Line of duty death,LODD)，或稱killed in flight accident,KIFA

國軍一直在宣導『演習視同作戰』，所以說這名飛官是KIA一點也不為過。 :unbelief: :unbelief:

高度再拉高一些就不會撞上了……

[YOUTUBE]2ncAbSlGg_E[/YOUTUBE]

這位飛官已經是摔第二次了！運氣真背？還是技術問題？

沒敵人也沒遭受攻擊，看懂英文就看吧，看不懂就算，反正人都走，爭這個顯然失焦

Killed in action (KIA) is a casualty classification generally used by militaries to describe the deaths of their own combatants at the hands of hostile forces.[1] The United States Department of Defense, for example, says that those declared KIA need not have fired their weapons but have been killed due to hostile attack. KIAs do not come from incidents such as accidental vehicle crashes and other "non-hostile" events or terrorism. KIA can be applied both to front-line combat troops and to naval, air and support troops. Someone who is killed in action during a particular event is denoted with a † (dagger) beside their name to signify their death in that event or events.

Further, KIA denotes one to have been killed in action on the battlefield whereas died of wounds (DOW) relates to someone who survived to reach a medical treatment facility. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) also uses DWRIA, rather than DOW, for "died of wounds received in action". However, historically, militaries and historians have used the former acronym.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killed_in_action

演習視同作戰那是説給不知為何而戰也沒有戰場可打仗生在承平時期的軍人聽，當自 慰鼓舞士氣的 :jolin:

有些觀點現在提出來討論應該算是不合時宜...
尤其這種軍方的事...
即便到最後也很難公開詳盡的資訊:unbelief: :unbelief: :unbelief: :unbelief:
看看當初復航掉在基隆河...
媒體輿論的風向...到最後調查結果...

最近早上出門,快到大寮看五分山都是晴空萬里.

晚上回家就罩了幾朵雲在這一排山上.. 上午天氣和過了中午後是差蠻多的.

:think:

飛官用生命保衛國家,鄉民用嘴砲質疑飛官