作者hugow

人玩電腦就好，不要被電腦玩了。
用intel還是amd不就都是用來做事嗎?
cpu快個幾%，你的報告就完美了?
你確定教授打作業分數還會問你，這報告是amd還是intel打的?
還是超頻有加分?

事情要回到本質來看，重點是在你用這部電腦以後你能做甚麼事情。
換言之就是你的技能。除了超頻 你還懂甚麼?我覺得這是個可以被深思的問題。
市場的變化其實不是單單一家就可以操控的，這也是有風險的。逆天而行就有被雷劈的風險。
當年IBM的32位元MCA匯流排架構就是個被雷劈的典範。總是會有像EISA這樣的反抗軍。
雖然他後來也被INTEL 的PCI掛了，但PCI總是一個比較開放的架構。
更何況amd還活的好好的，只是前一陣子架構效能沒甚麼重大進步。到FM2才有些比較可以看的東西。我說的重點在可以用的賣點，不是超頻這種對穩定沒益處的功能。我的客人聽到超頻會翻臉的。他們要的是穩定工作跟對他的營運系統有甚麼幫助。...

作者hugow

人玩電腦就好，不要被電腦玩了。
用intel還是amd不就都是用來做事嗎?
cpu快個幾%，你的報告就完美了?
你確定教授打作業分數還會問你，這報告是amd還是intel打的?
還是超頻有加分?

事情要回到本質來看，重點是在你用這部電腦以後你能做甚麼事情。
換言之就是你的技能。除了超頻 你還懂甚麼?我覺得這是個可以被深思的問題。
市場的變化其實不是單單一家就可以操控的，這也是有風險的。逆天而行就有被雷劈的風險。
當年IBM的32位元MCA匯流排架構就是個被雷劈的典範。總是會有像EISA這樣的反抗軍。
雖然他後來也被INTEL 的PCI掛了，但PCI總是一個比較開放的架構。
更何況amd還活的好好的，只是前一陣子架構效能沒甚麼重大進步。到FM2才有些比較可以看的東西。我說的重點在可以用的賣點，不是超頻這種對穩定沒益處的功能。我的客人聽到超頻會翻臉的。他們要的是穩定工作跟對他的營運系統有甚麼幫助。...

作者somewaylin

所以以後主機板或CPU掛了
要兩個一起換?? 通殺!!
要賺錢也不能醬玩吧!!
:jolin:

作者Eric.chang

隨便寫個"權威消息"就一堆人信了............ :unbelief:

作者dmwc

奇怪的就是消息來源只是鍵盤打一打，也沒有寫出處，更何況還是好幾年後

我聽到多個消息來源是今年 Intel 會推出一款 CPU ，不用耗電也不用安裝，買一顆不用錢外還會給你100 美金 rebate，買10顆再多送大樂透

作者Tech Report

Trusted source confirms soldered-on Broadwell CPUs

by Geoff Gasior — 4:50 PM on January 10, 2013

Back in November, PC Watch claimed that Intel would ditch socketed CPUs for Broadwell, the 14-nm successor to Haswell. Intel denied the rumor, pledging to offer socketed CPUs "for the foreseeable future." However, its statement didn't close the door on making some Broadwell chips available in BGA packages soldered onto motherboards. We now know why.

According to a trusted source in the motherboard industry, select Broadwell chips will indeed come soldered onto desktop motherboards. Lower-end models might not be available in socketed configurations at all, it seems. Our source did, however, reaffirm Intel's position that socketed CPUs aren't being dropped completely. We were told socketed processors are on the roadmap until at least 2016.

Interestingly, our source said selling motherboards with soldered-on CPUs gives larger board makers an advantage over their smaller rivals. Intel's higher-volume customers will be able to pull processors from larger pools of chips, allowing them to cherry pick parts for higher-end products. Motherboard makers may be able to sell boards with pre-overclocked CPUs—or at least with chips that have proven clock speed headroom.

RMAs will be more complicated with soldered-on CPUs, and it sounds like the details are still being worked out on that front. Our source said mobo makers may have to handle replacing damaged CPUs themselves, even if they're eventually reimbursed by Intel. Again, that could favor larger producers whose service facilities have the BGA soldering equipment required for the task. Those manufacturers probably have better RMA service anyway, though.

Moving some desktop processors to BGA-only packages makes a certain amount of sense, especially considering the increasing popularity of slim all-in-one systems and other small-form-factor designs. The lifespan of modern sockets has also shortened in recent years, with upgrades paths often limited to one or two generations before a new motherboard is required. It seems likely that whatever socketed chips remain in Intel's lineup will be higher-end offerings targeting gamers and enthusiasts.

作者bureia

前面有網友提到,筆電不就是這樣?
保內原廠會處理這些事情,
過保就要砍掉重練

買筆電的人好像也沒聽過有誰在抗議的?
智慧型手機跟平板同理可證