建議售價沒這麼高啦，新蛋上才賣4xx多而已，對岸那價格是稅很高，台灣這邊為啥也賣到近兩萬就要問問這些中間經銷商跟末端店家了

但其實也是有人17xxx左右入手的(這才是正常價格，目前跟當初4670初販售得狀況很像) :D

說老實話，殺爆、跳水還是車尾燈
都不重要
重要的是東西趕快出來!
不然只有一點是真的：Tahiti永遠就是這一口價不會下來

Kepler這次的消息真的是讓人看得眼花撩亂...
只能繼續等待看看了

聽說某個叫GT 640的東西已經悄悄出現...

現在的ATI售價都追上NV的售價了…
ATI對這一代相當的有信心，看來要等NV出了再看看了。
老樣子ATI國外賣的價格再加上5000台票等於台灣現在的售價。

各式各樣的謠言很有趣
儘管有些謠言用膝蓋想也知道是唬爛的
但只要能讓買家疑惑並 "繼續觀望" 就達到目的了...

不過還是很好奇GK104會是384bit?還是256bit?

如果GK104是384bit
肯定不是小核心
以N社的過去的定價策略來看
完整版的GK104賣US$299是不可能的...
(例如GTX550Ti是完整版的GF116,效能只有HD6770等級,但價格卻與HD6850幾乎相同)

如果GK104是256bit
過去N卡的記憶體控制器(MC)頻率通常都不如A卡
記憶體頻寬肯定大輸384bit的Tahiti XT(HD7970)
我看GK104能贏同樣256bit的Pitcairn XT(HD7870)就很不錯了...

希望GK104及Pitcairn能趕快推出
等著看兩家28nm產品的 "Performance/Dollar" 及"Performance/Watt" 表現...

http://www.pcpop.com/doc/0/757/757816.shtml
钛传奇再续 NVIDIA GK104或命名670Ti
2012年01月30日 09:26 泡泡网 【转载】 作者:mydrivers 编辑:张伟（编辑）

泡泡网显卡频道1月30日 GeForce GTX 560 Ti实现了“钛”字招牌的成功复兴，只是稍后的GeForce GTX 550 Ti有些名不副实，而来自国内硬件论坛的最新曝料称，NVIDIA下一代开普勒架构的中端核心GK104将会被命名为“GeForce GTX 670 Ti”。

目前一般认为GK104是目前GF114的升级换代核心，主打性能级市场，而按照NVIDIA近两年的产品命名方式，代号最后一位是4的核心往往会成为x60，比如说GeForce GTX 460、GeForce GTX 560/Ti等等，这次难道会有所不同？还是稍后再增加GeForce GTX 660 Ti、GeForce GTX 660？这些目前尚不得而知，但看起来NVIDIA似乎更加喜欢“Ti”这个招牌后缀了。

另外据一向比较靠谱的OBR报道，开普勒的第一款产品将在四月份发布，很可能就是GK104。最新的消息显示NVIDIA已经开始向笔记本制造商出货开普勒芯片，新本将于四月份伴随Intel Ivy Bridge一同上市，说不定就是GK104衍生核心的。■

更多傳言...
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/new...s-leak-out.aspx

In the past few weeks, we've seen various fishy rumors on the product specifications of first discrete GPU using the upcoming 28nm Kepler architecture the GK104. While we have known parts of the specifications, such as no hot clocks, the doubling of Streaming Multiprocessor (SM) node from 48 to 96 CUDA cores (i.e. Stream Processors), 256-bit memory controller, the real specifications are (finally) here... even though, our information differes minimally from information originally posted on 3DCenter.org.

NVIDIA Kepler GK104 Architectural overview: at first look, very similar to GF110, but then you take a deeper look: 1536 Stream Processors instead of 512!

First and foremost, in NVIDIA's internal nomenclature, this part should be named GeForce GTX 660 (the company is debating GeForce GTX 660, 670 or 680 - and the final verdict will 99% be GTX 680). This is a 349-399 dollar part which in conventional way would replace the 300-dollar "GeForce GTX 560 Ti 2GB", but will offer higher performance than GTX 580. Significantly higher… and more importantly, not just beating the $449 Radeon HD 7950 3GB, but also endangering the $549 Radeon HD 7970. Yeah, it is that fast.

Why? Because we're talking about 1536 CUDA cores divided in four Graphics Processing Clusters (GPC), all of which contain four Streaming Multiprocessors (SM). Given that there are 96 Stream Processors (or CUDA cores, NVIDIA seems they cannot make up their minds how to call them), we can see that for instance, the entry-level Kepler has a single SM unit with 96 CUDA cores/Stream Processors. Can you say… a mobile GPU part that allegedly taped out ages ago… and just by some accident, ended in a Samsung notebook? Only time will tell for those.

The base combinations for NVIDIA future GPUs now are 96 (1SM), 384 (1GPC), 768 (2GPC), 1536 (4GPC), 2304 CUDA cores/Stream Processors (6GPC). Given that we our sources are telling us the big monolithic die comes with 2304 SP, the question is what can be done with the memory controller. The logic dictates Kepler can come with the following memory controller configuration: 64-bit, 128-bit, 192-bit, 256-bit, 320-bit and 512-bit: to us, it is most logical that we see 64-bit low-end, 128-bit mainstream, 256-bit high-end and either 384-bit / 512-bit on the high-end compute side - and GeForce GTX 690, but this time as a single monolithic die, instead of typical mix'n'match of two high-end GPUs.

Continuing with the GK104 GPU, the chip has the same amount of fixed-function logic as competing Tahiti XT - 32 ROPs (Raster OPeration Units) and 128 TMUs (Texture Memory Units). As you can see in our architectural mockup, the decision to go with 256-bit memory controller results in 2GB GDDR5 and this is the only part where NVIDIA really loses to AMD: both 7950 and 7970 come with 3GB GDDR5 memory. True, the difference in planned price is estimated at $100 less for NVIDIA boards ($349-399 versus $449/7950 and $549/7970), which should mitigate the paper advantage of the HD 7900 Series.

How high can it go?
Just like GF110, the GK104 comes in two different versions: the GeForce board will run double-precision at one sixth rate - while Quadro and Tesla will run at typical half-rate. Just like AMD Southern Islands, we were told by one source that there is an architectural possibility of full rate DP (instruction, cache sizes) - but we do not believe in fairy tales.

The GPU clock is estimated at 950MHz, but our sources are telling us that there are different clocks running in Lab: 772MHz for clock-per-clock versus GTX 580, 925MHz for clock-per-clock versus Tahiti XT, while the clock range for the shipping parts is between 950 and 1000MHz. We were told that NVIDIA did not laugh too much at Verdetrol performance enhancing pills and that the company is trying to tweak the BIOS (more importantly, thermal envelope) in order to get the parts running at 1GHz. If NVIDIA fails, the partners are certain to offer a 1GHz board (just like in case of Tahiti XT and 3rd party vendors).

The memory is set at 1.25 GHz in Quad-Data Rate (QDR, i.e. 5GHz "effective"). This 25% boost over GF100/GF110 is something that thrilled NVIDIA engineers, since this is the first time their memory controllers were able to reach AMD with stable default clock frequency. Remember, unlike GDDR3 memory, GDDR5 is "activelly driven" and memory controller does much more than it used to. Given that AMD is actually the company that creates the memory standard, AMD's GPU engineers actually have a good advantage in terms of just how high can they clock the GDDR5 memory.

This clock results in 160GB/s video memory bandwidth, a drop from GTX 580 (192.4GB/s), but a big boost over GTX 560 Ti and its 128.27GB/s (excluding the OEM versions), and just a bit higher from GTX 560 Ti OEM (GF110 die), GTX 560 Ti 448 Cores LE and GTX 570, all having the same GDDR5 memory clock and bandwidth of 152GB/s.

All of this results with 2.9 to 3.05 TFLOPS single-precision, i.e. 486-500 GFLOPS double-precision. Quadro and potential Tesla versions of this board will feature unlocked double-precision, meaning identically clocked board would have around the same amount of DP-GFLOPS as GTX 580 had single-precision… an impressive boost indeed. In any case higher than what Fermi-based Quadros and Teslas were able to achieve.

You won't need to wait for too long, as NVIDIA is already starting pre-sale activities, and getting ready to counter AMD and their momentum with the Radeon 7700 (Cape Verde, February 15), 7800 (Pitcairn, March 6) and 7900 Series (released).

現在傳言一堆
問題是都還沒有實際的demo出現...
說再多也是白搭... :stupefy:

另外
carage
你還打算再弄外接嗎...@@a
已經搞掛了一台電腦+一個新的power(雖然這可以RMA)
:stupefy: :stupefy: :stupefy:

當然繼續弄下去呀，現在把GTX 560 TI接回來.
接下來還要持續關注TB.