講的很對,要找信用可靠級專業度夠的店家購買才是,不過個人見解,中環在國內的品質確實比錸德還差,若說liteon 48x用的是中環認證過,還不如說tdk 48x用的是錸德 再說
sony 48x用的是利碟,總歸一句,每家工廠還是會有好片,是要看店家及消費者的接受度
而定,若每各消費者都要求好又便宜,天底下哪有這麼好的事(除非要倒店),當然店家都會騙我們消費者,把b級說成a級,真正的a級當然會很然看得到,用久了自然....


---------------------------------------------------------
永遠買片要靠運氣的人

銷往德國中環製IMATION，似乎也不好，轉貼某德國網站的評論:

Imation CD-R 32x 700 MB
Instable: This CMC Magnetics CD-R doesn't deliver. With the Plextor, Benq and Lite-On 40x-max burners, error rates are more than critical at 32x speed. The Lite-On burner managed to achieve half-decent results at 24x speed. The analyzer measured an average block error rate (BLER) of 30.02 errors per second, quite much. But the maximum BLER of 171.17 errors/sec is dangerous for data integrity. Furthermore, there were E22 and E32 errors. Conclusion: Don't use this CD-R for important data. Atip (Absolute Time in Pregroove): 97m 26s 66f

上述文章從http://cd-rw.org/articles/archive/h...aerrorrates.cfm
摘錄

有沒有人知道atip=97m 15s 17f，是哪一家工廠做的，
因為這個網站對philips 40x評價非常爛.

Philips CD-R 80 40x:
It seems that Philips doesn't test their media. In the Benq 40x burner, the error rates were always above spec, same with the Plextor 40x. Data loss is likely. The Lite-On managed to do analyzable runs at 40x and 32x. BLER is 143 errors/sec average, 363.67 errors/sec maximum: A more than poor performance! To make things worse, the analyzer drive detected E22 and E32-errors. This CD-R is basically garbage. Atip (Absolute Time in Pregroove): 97m 15s 17f

我從 http://www.cdrinfo.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=6617 得知是 ritek做的，只是ritek不是已經不替philips代工嗎？這個網站居然說70min後會有錯誤發生。現在還有什麼片是便宜又大碗，料好又實在！

不知道中環的三菱片子如何...:confused:

個人感覺...
愈來愈難讀... 以前還會特地到光華去找 MIJ 的三菱湛藍片
現在比較懶了...