硬碟的讀取在於 seek time, rotation latency, access time, 這取決於硬體上的限制，在同樣時間內，平均讀取速度應該是不變的，格子大就讀比較少的格子，格子小就讀比較多的格子，並不是說格子大就跳比較快，就如你在玩跳房子，格子畫大一點你跳躍前進的速度就會變快？這樣的解釋似乎不太合理.....

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoc...y0_cstripe.html
若以Raid的stripe-unit size來做類比
效能不見得size大比較好
要看應用的場所
...performance in transaction-based environments, which typically involve large blocks of data, might be optimal when the stripe-unit size is set to 32 KB or 64 KB. However, performance in file and print environments, which typically involve multiple small blocks of data, might be optimal when the stripe-unit size is set to 8 KB or 16 KB....

所以硬碟的配置單元大小也不見得一定要設這麼大

切割一個2G以下的分割槽並且以FAT16的格式來格式化該分割槽應該就可以了吧...