吵著說輻射的可以看看這篇文章,目前直接輻射轉化為電能技術已經不是問題~

Materials that directly convert radiation into electricity could produce a new era of spacecraft and even Earth-based vehicles powered by high-powered nuclear batteries, say US researchers.

Electricity is usually made using nuclear power by heating steam to rotate turbines that generate electricity.

But beginning in the 1960s, the US and Soviet Union used thermoelectric materials that convert heat into electricity to power spacecraft using nuclear fission or decaying radioactive material. The Pioneer missions were among those using the latter, "nuclear battery" approach.

Dispensing with the steam and turbines makes those systems smaller and less complicated. But thermoelectric materials have very low efficiency. Now US researchers say they have developed highly efficient materials that can convert the radiation, not heat, from nuclear materials and reactions into electricity.

Power boost
Liviu Popa-Simil, former Los Alamos National Laboratory nuclear engineer and founder of private research and development company LAVM and Claudiu Muntele, of Alabama A&M University, US, say transforming the energy of radioactive particles into electricity is more effective.

The materials they are testing would extract up to 20 times more power from radioactive decay than thermoelectric materials, they calculate.

Tests of layered tiles of carbon nanotubes packed with gold and surrounded by lithium hydride are under way. Radioactive particles that slam into the gold push out a shower of high-energy electrons. They pass through carbon nanotubes and pass into the lithium hydride from where they move into electrodes, allowing current to flow.

"You load the material with nuclear energy and unload an electric current," says Popa-Simil.

Space probes
The tiles would be best used to create electricity using a radioactive material, says Popa-Simil, because they could be embedded directly where radiation is greatest. But they could also harvest power directly from a fission reactor's radiation.

Devices based on the material could be small enough to power anything from interplanetary probes to aircraft and land vehicles, he adds.

"I believe this work is innovative and could have a significant impact on the future of nuclear power," says David Poston, of the US Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory. However perfecting new nuclear technologies requires years of development, he adds.

Popa-Simil agrees, saying it will be at least a decade before final designs of the radiation-to-electricity concept are built.

A paper on the new nuclear power materials was presented on 25 March, at the Materials Research Society Spring Meeting 2008 , San Francisco, California, US.



http://www.newscientist.com/article...lectricity.html

在下沒說地震一定發生在台北盆地,而是說發生在媒體敘述的斷層帶上,請問您有仔細看嗎?
再說,要台灣的核電廠發生和福島核電廠一樣的情況,那要多大的地震才能造成?
雖然這樣說不好,但是,因為福島的事故是已經存在的事實,在下更能確定政府在發生同等級災難的時候不會硬撐下去

那萬一不是媒體發生的斷層帶呢

你前面不是自己說的8~9級淺層地震

台灣政府高官的自私腦殘是已經存在的事實,那我更能確定政府在發生同等級災難的時候一定會硬撐下去

日本會變成這樣,也不是官員真白癡

有誰會認為,有官員會為了設備不停爐搞到可能整各東日本要放棄?

當然不會

但是這種事情還是發生在日本

因為很簡單,事前沒有人會想到,等到想到,已經是走到無可挽回的地步

日本會如此,台灣何嘗不會?

台灣官員都是天才,有通靈能力,可以預測未來?

一定是層層通報,窮盡辦法挽救設備而不可得,才會想要停爐

但是有誰能保證拖到那時候來得及?

那樣,問題就會是:要多大的地震造成的災難,才能讓台灣的核電廠面臨和福島核電廠一樣的狀況?
核電廠的耐震能力比起大部分的建築物要高,如果真的發生了,臨近地方會被破壞成什麼樣子是很難想像的
更何況在下也說了,有福島事故在先,政府不會為了保全設備而死撐到底

仙谷由人算是那一號傻B啊？民主黨代理政調會長？前官房長官？說穿了不就是現任黨工、下台的行政院秘書長嗎？
比起台灣的神力超人、無所不懂、諾貝爾化學獎得主李大博士未免也差得太遠。他的兩句屁話，就值得被擁核派拿來說嘴？水準也太差了吧！
擁核派如果搬出行政院前秘書長薛香川，來倡導核電的必要性，恐怕會被一堆人吐口水淹死，怎麼換個日本的「前行政院秘書長」，講話說像聖經了？
就算想擁核，也該把腦袋裡的屎先掏乾淨了再來戰吧！

前面就貼過了

報導更指出，一般建築的防震係數為0.25g到0.4g（g為地表重力加速度），而國內核一、核二廠以廠房基礎面(岩盤表面)耐震分別為0.3g與0.4g，即分別可耐規模7.3及8的地震；但係數越高相對被認為越安全，以日本、美國的核電廠的防震係數為例，皆在0.6g以上。

我也說過了腦殘高官一定會死撐到底

台灣政府何時會記取教訓了,更何況是別人家的教訓

這樣不就回到在下強調的,如核電廠的所在地受到這個等級的搖動不管是不是震央,臨近地區自然也是激烈晃動,這樣的破壞力,會給台北盆地帶來滅頂之災的,到時,交通都中斷了是要怎麼逃?


看起來,閣下與在下的對談似乎是沒有交集的可能,只能說彼此的想法差異太大了......

有一種東西叫直升機

對啊,對台灣官員莫名其妙的信心是哪裡來的...

福島核電廠完全是人禍，緊急電源明明只能撐八個小時不到，卻要拖到電池沒電才來處理
還多花了兩天想要起動冷卻系統，而不是直接導海水冷卻
儘管如此，福島123號機組還是撐了超過48小時才核心熔毀，而且第二次圍阻體還是擋住了99%的放射線物質外洩

我相信不會有人否認現階段核電廠永遠都會遇到臨界反應的可能性
但不是代表核電廠無法處理類似的危機

你可以假設很多很多，但事實就是如此，儘管諸多人禍發生在福島核電廠，核電廠還是挺住了
日本也沒有毀滅，我也不信任政府，不信任官僚，不信任台電

但是我認為有幾分證據說幾分話，核電廠的安全紀錄的確還可以接受

六輕起火釋放出來的有毒物質，你不擔心
九級大地震還沒發生，你就說核電廠會爆炸了，這樣對嗎？